Fine Wind, Clear Morning, also known as Red Fuji, is a woodblock print by the Japanese artist Hokusai, part of his series Thirty-Six Views of Mount Fuji and dating from about 1830 to 1832. It depicts Mount Fuji lit red by the rising sun beneath a clear sky lightly streaked with cloud, with no human figures, boats or other landmarks present, and has been described as one of the simplest and at the same time one of the most outstanding of all Japanese prints.
Facts
Disputed
Year CreatedThe Thirty-Six Views of Mount Fuji series, of which this print is part, is dated only to circa 1830 to 1832 in the source; no more precise year is fixed for this individual print. MediumPolychrome woodblock print (ukiyo-e) on paper 1 Medium
Medium (category) Connections
Created By
In Form
In Genre
Entity-backed identity for the genre enum value this work already carries, resolved to an arts art-form by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The genre fact itself, with its own citation, stays on the work unchanged.
In Movement
Sources
1. Wikipedia
Wikimedia FoundationFine Wind, Clear Morning article, lead section, description clause
one of the simplest and at the same time one of the most outstanding of all Japanese prints
Fine Wind, Clear Morning article, lead section, first sentence
is a woodblock print by Japanese artist Hokusai
Fine Wind, Clear Morning article, lead section, alternate title clause
also known as Red Fuji
Genre reference
Fine Wind, Clear Morning, also known as Red Fuji, is a woodblock print by the Japanese artist Hokusai, part of his series Thirty-Six Views of Mount Fuji and dating from about 1830 to 1832.
View the Source 2. Fine Wind, Clear Morning (Wikipedia)
lead paragraphQuote, lead paragraph
Fine Wind, Clear Morning (Japanese: 凱風快晴, Hepburn: Gaifū kaisei; literally South Wind, Clear Sky), also known as Red Fuji (赤富士, Akafuji), is a woodblock print by Japanese artist Hokusai (1760-1849), part of his Thirty-six Views of
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.