Arts and Music Atlas

Works, Makers, Traditions
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Artist

Bichitr

Painters

Bichitr is recorded in the Getty Union List of Artist Names with the biographical note: Indian miniaturist, active ca. 1615-1650. Getty classifies the person under these roles: miniaturist. The nationality terms attached to the record are Indian. The record carries 2 forms of the name and the identifier 500336838. In this atlas the person is linked as the creator of Jahangir Preferring a Sufi Shaikh to Kings.

Facts
Classification
Gender
Male 1
Active From Year
1615 1
Bichitr
Filter Results1 entry
Connections

Practices

Painting, Art Forms
Source Getty Research Institute, Union List of Artist Names: Getty ULAN record for Bichitr

Works Created

Source Jahangir Preferring a Sufi Shaikh to Kings (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Nationality

Also in Geography Atlas: the nationality of this subject.

Source Getty Research Institute, Union List of Artist Names: Getty ULAN record for BichitrRecord display
Quote, Record display
Bichitr (Indian miniaturist, active ca. 1615-1650)
Sources
1. Getty Research Institute, Union List of Artist Names: Getty ULAN record for Bichitr
Getty Research Institute, Union List of Artist Names
  • Record heading
    Bichitr (Indian miniaturist, active ca. 1615-1650)
  • Gender field
    Gender: male
View the Source
Bichitr (Wikipedia)
In Group: Painters of Non-Western Traditions, Lead
Quote, In Group: Painters of Non-Western Traditions, Lead
was an Indian painter during the Mughal period
View the Source
Jahangir Preferring a Sufi Shaikh to Kings (Wikipedia)
Works Created: Jahangir Preferring a Sufi Shaikh to Kings, Wikipedia intro
Quote, Works Created: Jahangir Preferring a Sufi Shaikh to Kings, Wikipedia intro
Jahangir Preferring a Sufi Shaikh to Kings is a Mughal miniature painting by the Indian artist Bichitr for the court of the Fourth Mughal emperor Jahangir, dated to c. 1615-1618.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.